<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Reviews, Bad Reviews</title>
	<link>http://blog.russelnod.com/2008/03/31/good-reviews-bad-reviews/</link>
	<description>Covering the food scene in western Massachusetts, from its farms to its kitchens to its restaurants.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 05:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalie</title>
		<link>http://blog.russelnod.com/2008/03/31/good-reviews-bad-reviews/#comment-621</link>
		<author>Rosalie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.russelnod.com/2008/03/31/good-reviews-bad-reviews/#comment-621</guid>
					<description>"Being witty at someone’s expense is fun for the moment, but in print it lives past the moment . . . ."  AMEN!   I wish all reviewers -- and not only of restaurants -- would read these words before they sat down to write.  The anonymity of print tempts writers to forget that the people involved in a project -- a restaurant, a play, a building -- were trying hard to do something good.  Being told that you've failed is bad enough; the snarky, contemptuous voice of many reviews is cruel and unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Being witty at someone’s expense is fun for the moment, but in print it lives past the moment . . . .&#8221;  AMEN!   I wish all reviewers &#8212; and not only of restaurants &#8212; would read these words before they sat down to write.  The anonymity of print tempts writers to forget that the people involved in a project &#8212; a restaurant, a play, a building &#8212; were trying hard to do something good.  Being told that you&#8217;ve failed is bad enough; the snarky, contemptuous voice of many reviews is cruel and unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
